This scientist understands the power of a “news peg.” What will people be talking about? Figure that out, and you have a hook for teaching physics, and lots of other things. Add “global warming” and you get lots of hits.
Nathan is Professor Emeritus of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. After a long career doing collisions of subatomic particles, he now spends his time studying the collision of ash with cowhide. He maintains an oft-visited website devoted to all things related to the physics of baseball: go.illinois.edu/physicsofbaseball.
via Baseball Prospectus | Baseball ProGUESTus: Global Warming and Home Runs: Is There a Connection?.
This is for Don. Now I will take his picture.
This is an iPad post. I typed it
I was in New Orleans when it happened April 13, when the powers that be at the Associated Press announced that “hopefully” was OK to use however anybody wanted. The audience of American Copy Editors Society members may have been the only group in America who even knew that “hopefully” had standards of usage. But I was hungry for lunch. Maybe my news judgment was skewed by my hunger. I didn’t find that style rule change to be worth a story in the Washington Post. Hmm. The 225 commenters (so far) couldn’t be all wrong, I hope.
AP’s approval of ‘hopefully’ symbolizes larger debate over language – The Washington Post.
Most recent experience, dates, education. Read more at LinkedIn.
“Headless body in topless bar” killer denied parole – chicagotribune.com.
Great headline in print in the New York Post in 1983 also works for the Web because the words are specific. The Tribune story said the Newsday headline read “Night of Terror.” That worked on a newspaper page with the context of other words and pictures, but it is too general for a good match in a search engine.
The story goes that the New York Post sent a staff member to verify that the bar had topless dancing. The Poynter story explains it.
Chinese Readers on the ‘iEconomy’ – NYTimes.com.
The articles about Apple are intriguing. I also find this editing strategy to be so. How do we encourage reader reaction? Here’s one way.